NoDesign

An article by Paul Rand on Design Policy

The Politics of Design by Paul Rand

I t is no secret That the real world in the designer functions Which Is Not the World of Art, the objective world of buying and selling. For dirty and not design are the raison d'etre of "any business organization. Unlikable the salesman, howeve, the designer's motivation Overriding is Art: Art in the service of business, art That Enhances the Quality of Life and Deepens appreciation of the familiar world.

Design is a problem-solving activity. It Provider moyen de Clarifying, Synthesizing, and dramatizing a word, a picture, a product, or event year. A Serious Barrier to the realization of good design, howeve, the layers of management are inherent in "any Bureaucratic structure. For aside from the sheer prejudice or simple unawareness, one apt to encounter IS SUCH Absurdities as second guessing, kow-towing, Posturing, nit-picking, and jockeying for position, let alone SUCH buck-passing institutions as the committee meeting and the Task strength. At end, It Seems, IS Neither malevolence nor stupidity, human frailty goal.

The smooth fonctionnement of the design process' may be thwarted in Other Ways, by the imperceptive executive, who in matters of design Neither Understands That Loved normal Proper Role of the designer, by the end Eager Man Whose Cautious advertising main concern IS Pleasing Loved client; and by the insecure client Depends Who are informal office surveys and pseudo-scientific research to deal with issues That are unanswerable and answers That are questionable.

UNLESS the design function in business Bureaucracy That Is So structured direct access to the ultimate decision-maker is Possible, trying to Produce Is very good work Often exercise in Futility year. Ignorance of the history and methodology of design - how work IS Conceived, Produced, and Reproduced - ADDS to the Difficulties and misunderstanding. Design is a way of life, a point of view. It Involves the Whole "of complex visual communication: talent, creative flexible loan, manual skill, and technical KM. Aesthetics and economics, technology and psychology are intrinsically relates to the process.

One of the more common Problems Which tend to create Doubt and Confusion Is Caused By The Inexperienced and Anxious Who Executive innocently expect, or event requires, not to see one goal Many solutions to a problem. These include a number of May visual and / or record concepts, year assortment of layouts, a Variety of Pictures and color schemes, as well as "a choice of type style. He Needs the reassurance of numbers and the Opportunity to exercise personal preferences Loved. He est aussi Most Likely to Be the One to INSIST on endless revisions with unrealistic deadlines, Adding to year Already wasteful and time-consuming ritual. Theoretically, a great number of ideas insured has great number of choices, goal SUCH Essentially choices are quantitative. This practice IS've bewildering as It Is wasteful. It Discourage spontaneity, encourages indifference, and more Often than not results Which Produces Neither are distinguished, interesting, nor effective. In short, good ideas come in bunches Rarely.

The Designer Who Loved voluntarily present customers with a batch of layouts n Does not out prolificacy, drank out of fear Uncertainty gold. He Malthus encouraged the client to assume the role of referee. In the event of genuine Need, howeve, the Skillful Design Is Able to Produce a reasonable number of good ideas. Purpose quantity by demand IS quite different Than quantity by choice. Design is a time-consuming occupation. Whatever Loved working clothes, the designer fills Many a wastebasket in Order to Produce one good idea. Advertising Agencies Can Be Especially guilty in this numbers game. Bent is Impressing the client with Their Ardor, They present a welter of layouts, Many of Which are superficial interpretations of potentially good ideas, or slick renderings of trite ones.

Frequent job reassignment Within dette year are additional Impediments about IS Which Often Unaware management. Persons unqualified to make design Judgments are frequently Shifted Into Design-sensitive positions. The position of authority "IS THEN Used as evidence of expertise. WHILE MOST People Will Appreciate and accept criticism graciously When It Comes From A knowledgeable source, They Will resent it (Openly or Otherwise) Solely When It derived from a power position, Even Though the manager 'may be Highly intelligent or self-professed Have "good Taste. "At the right end Is Not, Even The Golden duty, to question, aim to make the right design jugement. Suche Misuse of Privilege Is a disservice to management and counterproductive to good design. Expertise in business administration, journalism, accounting, selling gold, Though Necessary in ITS place, Problems Is Not Dealing with expertise in Visual Appearance. The salesman Who can sell you the MOST sophisticated computer typesetting equipment IS Rarely one Who Appreciate fine typography or elegant proportions. Actually, bad design of the plethora That we see all around us can have attributed, Probably Be Much to good salesmanship to have bad taste.

Deeply Concerned With Every aspect of the production process, the designer must contender Often Inexperienced with production personnel and time-consuming procedures to sans, Stifler Which Enthusiasm, instinct, and creativity. Though peripherally Involved in making aesthetic Judgments (Choosing printers, papermakers, typesetters and Other Suppliers) Purchasing Agent for the MOST part are ignorant of design practices, insensitive to subtleties That mean quality, and Unaware of marketing needs. Primarily Concerned with Rightly and cost-cutting, They mistakenly equate elegance with extravagance and parsimony with wise business judgment.

These are by no means clustering Problems Confined To The Bureaucratic Corporation. Artists, writers, and others in the fields of communication and visual arts, in government or private Industry, in churches or schools, must cope with Constantly Those Who Do Not Understand and are unsympathetic to Therefor Their Ideas. The Design Is Especially vulnerable Because Design is grist for anybody's mill. "I know what I I like" Is All the authority "to support one besoins one's critical aspirations.

Like the businessman, the designer IS Amply Supplied with Loved Own frailties. Purpose unlikable Him, HE IS Often inarticulate, serious problem in a year in arena Which semantic Difficulties na Often ARISE. This is more pertinent in graphic design in the industrial Than Gold architectural fields, Because graphic design is more open to aesthetic Than to functional preferences.

Stubborness' may be one of the designer's notorious Golden admirable qualities (DEPENDING on one's point of view) - a principled refusal granted to compromise, gold means clustering to camouflage inadequacy. Design cliches, Meaningless patterns, stylish illustrations, and predetermined solutions are signs of Weakness SUCH. An understanding of the significance of modernism and Familiarity with the history of design, painting, architecture, and Other disciplines Educated Which Distinguish the designer and make more Meaningful Loved role, are not Every Designer's strong points.

The designer, howeve, Needs All The ET can muster support, for Loved Is a single goal unenviable position. His work IS Every conceivable subject to interpretation and to Every piddling piece of fact-finding. Ironically, not only ET Seeks the applause of the connoisseur, the purpose of approving the crowd.

A salutary working relationship can only aim Is Not essential. Designers are Not Always intransigent, nor are all staff to sans blind to quality. Many are not responsible Advertising Agencies Unaware of the role design plays That have a communication force. As for the person Who the country piper, the businessman who's sympathetic and understanding Is Not Altogether illusory. Drake professional, objective, and alert to new ideas ". He places responsibility "WHERE It Belongs and Does not feel insecure Enough to see Himself year as an expert in a field Other Than His Own. Drake, Moreover, Able Reasons to be a Harmonious Environment in Which goodwill, understanding, spontaneity, and "mutual trust - qualities so essential to the Accomplishment of creative work - may flourish.

Similarly, the skilled graphic designer Is a professional Whose World Is Divided Between Pragmatism and lyricism. Drake Able to Distinguish Between trendiness and innovation, Between Obscurity and Originality. He uses freedom of expression have not a license for abstruse ideas, and tenacity did not have objective evidence of bullheadedness Own Loved convictions. His independent spirit ya une guided more by an "inner artistic standard of excellence" (1) by Than Some external influence. At the time Sami did ET Realizes That Good Design Must Withstand the rigors of the marketplace, hey Believes That Without good design the marketplace Is a showcase of visual vulgarity.

The creative arts labored Have Always Under adverse conditions. Subjectivity emotion, and opinion prononcer To Be concomitant of artistic issues. The layman Feels insecure and awkward about making design Judgments, Even Though ET pretend to make 'em with a certain measure of know-how. Purpose, like it or not, business conditions Compel many to get inextricably Involved with Problems in Which Some design plays role.

For the MOST part, the creation of design gold effects, unlikable science, nor are Measurable Neither manifeste, nor are the results repeatable Necessarily. If There Is "any insurance Beside faith, a businessman can Hague, it is in. Choosing talented, competent, and Experienced designers.

Meaningful design, design of quality and wit, Is No small achievement, Even In year Environment in Which Design is good Understood, Appreciated, and ardently accepted, and in favor Which Is Not the only motivation. At best, Work That Has "any claim to distinction Is The exception, Even Under The Circumstances MOST ideal. After all, o epoch can Boast of only one AM Cassandre.

Paul Rand

from "A Designer's Art"

(1) Anthony Storr, "The Dynamics of Creation" (New York, 1972), 189.

Article from the wonderful site on Paul Rand